Re: Tzeentch's Thread of Everchanging Topics

by **Ataris** Fri May 28, 2010 1:21 pm

Lini wrote:
Archal/Hazrah/Vaneyk wrote:
Nearly all the ISPs where I live block 50% of the internet. I was actually more surprised to see that 4chan or whatever would be blocked! I thought it was some sort of kids' TV show program or something.

The reasons your ISP listed for blocking 4chan ALL apply to 4chan. Pornography, racism, violence, hate, forum. They don't call it the cesspool of the interweb for nothing.

Oh, hilarity. xD

by **Geldar** Fri May 28, 2010 2:15 pm

Fox news really knows how to twist things up! Anonymus, the Al`queda of the internet!

Tzeentch's Thread of Everchanging Topics - Page 13 WindowsLiveWriter_AnonymousFinalbossoftheInternet_96AA_Legion_Motiv_2

Tzeentch's Thread of Everchanging Topics - Page 13 WindowsLiveWriter_AnonymousFinalbossoftheInternet_96AA_Legion_Motiv_2

by Guest Fri May 28, 2010 3:37 pm

RULE NUMBER ONE OF /B/, YOU DON"T TALK ABOUT /B/, EVER!

by **Lini** Fri May 28, 2010 5:59 pm

Archal/Hazrah/Vaneyk wrote:RULE NUMBER ONE OF /B/, YOU DON"T TALK ABOUT /B/, EVER!

Coincidentaly, you were the first one to mention it.

Also, that "rule" only applies to raids as far as I know.

by Guest Fri May 28, 2010 6:40 pm

Lini wrote:
Archal/Hazrah/Vaneyk wrote:RULE NUMBER ONE OF /B/, YOU DON"T TALK ABOUT /B/, EVER!
Coincidentaly, you were the first one to mention it.

Also, that "rule" only applies to raids as far as I know.

Nope.

Rules of the internet, rules one and two.

by **Ehrfürchtige Bennedict** Fri May 28, 2010 6:48 pm

Archal/Hazrah/Vaneyk wrote:RULE NUMBER ONE OF /B/, YOU DON"T TALK ABOUT /B/, EVER!

What is /B/?

by **Gesh** Fri May 28, 2010 6:54 pm

Bennedict wrote:
Archal/Hazrah/Vaneyk wrote:RULE NUMBER ONE OF /B/, YOU DON"T TALK ABOUT /B/, EVER!

What is /B/?

by **Ehrfürchtige Bennedict** Fri May 28, 2010 7:00 pm

Madel/Vectoria/Koblitz wrote:
Bennedict wrote:
Archal/Hazrah/Vaneyk wrote:RULE NUMBER ONE OF /B/, YOU DON"T TALK ABOUT /B/, EVER!

What is /B/?

<Drags Bennedict's corpse into the alley>

by Guest Fri May 28, 2010 7:01 pm

I dont know no /b/ or /v/ or /shit/

I only know \m/ bounce

\m/

by **Gesh** Fri May 28, 2010 7:12 pm

[quote="Bennedict"]

Madel/Vectoria/Koblitz wrote:
Bennedict wrote:
Archal/Hazrah/Vaneyk wrote:RULE NUMBER ONE OF /B/, YOU DON"T TALK ABOUT /B/, EVER!

What is /B/?

by **Nathiniós** Fri May 28, 2010 7:17 pm

Oh god damn it. This turned into newfag /b/ faggotry now.

Protip: The rules of the internet shouldn't be taken seriously. Except rule 34, but yeah.

by **Kristeas Sunbinder** Fri May 28, 2010 7:25 pm

Rule 34 is a paradox.

by **Nathiniós** Fri May 28, 2010 7:38 pm

O rly?

by **Kristeas Sunbinder** Fri May 28, 2010 7:40 pm

If rule 34 applies to everything, then it also does to rule 34, and then it applies to rule 34 about rule 34, followed by rule 34 on rule 34 about rule 34 etc.

by **Nathiniós** Fri May 28, 2010 7:50 pm

I've actually found an exception that proves rule 34.

Asian men screwing black women.

by **(Goggy) - Exilius** Fri May 28, 2010 8:36 pm

Nathiniós wrote:I've actually found an exception that proves rule 34.

Asian men screwing black women.

by **Nathiniós** Sat May 29, 2010 12:13 am

Tzeentch's Thread of Everchanging Topics - Page 13 12745510

Don't see what it has to do with my statement tho'.

by Guest Sat May 29, 2010 12:21 am

by Guest Sat May 29, 2010 7:01 am

Kristeas Sunbinder wrote:If rule 34 applies to everything, then it also does to rule 34, and then it applies to rule 34 about rule 34, followed by rule 34 on rule 34 about rule 34 etc.

Actually, rule 34 states (or was it rule 35) That rule 34 IS an exception

Tzeentch's Thread of Everchanging Topics - Page 13 Rules_of_the_internet_v2

by **Lilenath/Ilynaeth** Sat May 29, 2010 7:38 am

This is why I get annoyed. That list. And how everyone takes it as fact.

by Guest Sat May 29, 2010 8:39 am

It IS fact, my dear sinbelolly.

Very Happy

by **Nathiniós** Sat May 29, 2010 8:43 am

Archal/Hazrah/Vaneyk wrote:
Kristeas Sunbinder wrote:If rule 34 applies to everything, then it also does to rule 34, and then it applies to rule 34 about rule 34, followed by rule 34 on rule 34 about rule 34 etc.

Actually, rule 34 states (or was it rule 35) That rule 34 IS an exception

Tzeentch's Thread of Everchanging Topics - Page 13 12547614

by **Kristeas Sunbinder** Sat May 29, 2010 9:25 am

That's not a sinbeloller.
Also, your list is obsolete.

http://rulesoftheinternet.com/index.php5?title=Main_Page

Rules: -x+2^3. to 10000

by **Nathiniós** Sat May 29, 2010 9:43 am

God damn it. Applying rules to the internet is retarded.

by **Kristeas Sunbinder** Sat May 29, 2010 9:44 am

It's not retarded, it just makes no sense.

by Sponsored content